000 02426nam a22002297a 4500
005 20260508122439.0
008 260508b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
020 _a9780674417328
028 _a: International Book Distributors
_b: 17, Prakash Apartment, 4405/2, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, New Delhi
_c: 122797
_d: 25/04/2026
082 _a320.0954 VAJ
100 _aVajpeyi, Ananya.
245 _aRighteous Republic
_b: The Political Foundations of Modern India.
_c/ Ananya Vajpeyi.
260 _a, England
_b: Harvard University Press
_c, 2014.
300 _axxiv, 341p.
_c: 24cm.
365 _b419
520 _aWhat India’s founders derived from Western political traditions as they struggled to free their country from colonial rule is widely understood. Less well-known is how India’s own rich knowledge traditions of two and a half thousand years influenced these men as they set about constructing a nation in the wake of the Raj. In Righteous Republic, Ananya Vajpeyi furnishes this missing account, a ground-breaking assessment of modern Indian political thought. Taking five of the most important founding figures―Mohandas Gandhi, Rabindranath Tagore, Abanindranath Tagore, Jawaharlal Nehru, and B. R. Ambedkar―Vajpeyi looks at how each of them turned to classical texts in order to fashion an original sense of Indian selfhood. The diverse sources in which these leaders and thinkers immersed themselves included Buddhist literature, the Bhagavad Gita, Sanskrit poetry, the edicts of Emperor Ashoka, and the artistic and architectural achievements of the Mughal Empire. India’s founders went to these sources not to recuperate old philosophical frameworks but to invent new ones. In Righteous Republic, a portrait emerges of a group of innovative, synthetic, and cosmopolitan thinkers who succeeded in braiding together two Indian knowledge traditions, the one political and concerned with social questions, the other religious and oriented toward transcendence. Within their vast intellectual, aesthetic, and moral inheritance, the founders searched for different aspects of the self that would allow India to come into its own as a modern nation-state. The new republic they envisaged would embody both India’s struggle for sovereignty and its quest for the self.
650 _aPhilosophy
650 _aPolitical Science
650 _aHistory
700 _aAnanya Vajpeyi.
942 _cBOOK
999 _c68053
_d68053