Food sovereignty, agroecology and biocultural diversity. :: Constructing and contesting knowledge /Michel Pimbert
Material type:
TextPublisher number: Atlantic Publishers & Distributors (P)Ltd. | ;7/22,Ansari Road ,Daryaganj ,New DelhiPublication details: London : Routledge , 2016.Description: xix,337 Pages ;24 cmISBN: - 9781138955363
- 333.9516 PIM
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Books
|
SNU LIBRARY | 333.9516 PIM (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan | 25781 |
Chapter 1. Constructing knowledge for food sovereignty, agroecology and biocultural diversity: an overview Michel P. PimbertChapter 2. How agricultural research systems shape a technological regime that develops genetic engineering but locks out agroecological innovationsGaetan Vanloqueren and Philippe V. BaretChapter 3. Sustainability science and `ignorance-based' management for a resilient future Steve L. Light and Kristen BlannChapter 4. On non-equilibrium and nomadism: knowledge, diversity and global modernity in drylands Sian Sullivan and Katherine HomewoodChapter 5. Sub-Saharan Africa, Kenya and the Malthusian paradigm in contemporary development thinkingEric B. RossChapter 6. Plants that speak and institutions that don't listen: notes on the protection of traditional knowledgeNina Isabella MoellerChapter 7. Economics: the limitations of a special caseGilbert RistChapter 8. Democratizing knowledge and ways of knowing for food sovereignty, agroecology, and biocultural diversityMichel P. Pimbert
‘Food sovereignty’ is understood here as a transformative process that seeks to recreate the democratic realm and regenerate a diversity of autonomous food systems based on agroecology, biocultural diversity, equity, social justice and ecological sustainability. It is shown that alternatives to the current model of development require radically different knowledges and epistemologies from those on offer today in mainstream institutions (including universities, policy think tanks and donor organizations). To achieve food sovereignty, agroecology and biocultural diversity, there is a need to re-imagine and construct knowledge for diversity, decentralisation, dynamic adaptation and democracy.
The authors critically explore the changes in organizations, research paradigms and professional practice that could help transform and co-create knowledge for a new modernity based on plural definitions of wellbeing. Particular attention is given to institutional, pedagogical and methodological innovations that can enhance cognitive justice by giving hitherto excluded citizens more power and agency in the construction of knowledge. The book thus contributes to the democratization of knowledge and power in the domain of food, environment and society.
There are no comments on this title.