Why Religion is Natural and Science is Not / Robert N. McCauley
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
SNU LIBRARY | 201.65 MCC (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan | 29075 |
Browsing SNU LIBRARY shelves Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
201 KIE Fear and Trembling | 201 SMI Meaning and End of Religion | 201 SPI A theologico-political treatise and a political treatise | 201.65 MCC Why Religion is Natural and Science is Not | 201.652 SAR Vedangajyautisha | 201.66 STO Deus in machina | 201.72 AGA The Kingdom and the Glory |
List of Figures; Acknowledgments; Introduction; Chapter One: Natural Cognition; Chapter Two: Maturational Naturalness; Chapter Three: Unnatural Science; Chapter Four: Natural Religion; Chapter Five: Surprising Consequences; Notes; References; Index
The battle between religion and science, competing methods of knowing ourselves and our world, has been raging for many centuries. Now scientists themselves are looking at cognitive foundations of religion--and arriving at some surprising conclusions. Over the course of the past two decades, scholars have employed insights gleaned from cognitive science, evolutionary biology, and related disciplines to illuminate the study of religion. In Why Religion is Natural and Science Is Not, Robert N. McCauley, one of the founding fathers of the cognitive science of religion, argues that our minds are b
There are no comments on this title.